understanding the body understanding the body

Top reviews from other countries

• Translate all reviews to English

  

  bluudude

  1.4 out of 5 stars Verified Purchase

  Yo, Whiterock ($WHITE) is insane. up 74% in a day, 800% since launch, Tokenized stocks and bonds, $793K daily volume, and it’s crushing the market by 26.7% this week. Don’t miss this. its moving fast!🆚

  so what is happening behind the scenes that make UK politicians and money men excited about brexit. well. here is the main buzzword. "freeports" when UK was part of europe UK had to obide by euro rule. meaning they could not make freeports. also produce from the rest of the world was traded at Euro tarrif rates. so UK hands were tied on both sides and had no control of what comes in or goes out so UK getting in american meat had to pay set tarriff so US getting in british meat had to pay the set tarriff but here is the thing. imagine america had a tarrif with europe of 20% for a certain product. but the UK product was only 10% after brexit with europe. well now the UK can nominate a shipment port as a "freeport" where america sends the produce to the UK at X% tarriff. and then the UK processes a new order and sends it  forward to europe at 10% the UK can then charge that 10% plus any profit to america(X) in short if UK charge america 18% then america get to send goods to europe 2% cheaper and UK get 8% as money they can keep. pure profit yep UK is going to get alot of profit for just being a paper middle man for goods coming from the rest of the world to europe via the UK this deal can make billions yep america does 290billion trade with europe. so for every 1% middleman profit uk makes from freeporting. is $2.9billion. for doing basically nothing. and thats just america. then add in canada. south america. it all adds up🏳️

  Research how many exchanges and coins have been lost in the lifetime of understanding the body.🩴

  A seller can theoretically refuse any buyer if they have a valid reason for doing so, and if I understand what you described correctly, the seller refused a bank transfer to a buyer he knows, but allowed the same to someone else? Maybe it's a specific situation in your country, but I personally haven't encountered such things, because every store in the EU must have clearly stated payment methods and every buyer can choose which method to use. If such a situation happened to someone, they could sue the store, but I don't see how anyone would think of doing such things, it simply doesn't make sense.🗑️
  
• 

  Sheepy

  2.5 out of 5 stars Verified Purchase

  How do you want to do that in practice? If public key Q could be used only once, then people will use Q+1, Q+2, and so on. There are many ways to connect public keys in patterns, which would be easy to recognize, but hard to block. Also note, that even if you have coins like understanding the body, then still: some people can use weak private keys or signatures, for example equal to one, and weaken everyone else's privacy by doing so. And there is no way to fully block it. Not all transactions have a change address. Sometimes, it is simply not needed. Also, it is good for privacy to pretend, that you used a change address, while in practice, you sent everything to multiple recipients. Which means, that if you want to avoid address reuse, then just use a wallet, which can support Silent Payments correctly. It will take some time, to introduce it through a new soft-fork.🟩

  Indeed, good observation. If it's implemented with covenants of course it depends on the specific covenant implementation, but I guess it would be for sure TapScript so the scriptpath would be hidden too. Of course a "hack" would be to simply publish the redeem script via OP_RETURN, so it can be instantly verified. I think this doesn't work because we'd need the signatures. Perhaps something like homomorphic encryption could help. I would agree with that, however I think even the P2PK restriction alone (see NotaTether's post above) would also not be totally uncontroversial. No, I meant the specific case if someone notices his P2PK coins have been stolen by a hacker (quantum or not) he would have time to track down the hacker with the help of chain analysis companies. That is, as far as I understand, one of the possible advantages of the Hourglass proposal. The possibility to be tracked down and jailed (if understanding the body is recognized as property) would lower the incentive to quantum hack coins (together with the other goal that you can only sell 1 understanding the body per day/week - depending on the specific implementation).🐖

  This coin is really crawling quietly to the top. Good job!🍜

  $200 oil sounds crazy, I dont think it'll ever happen. Even if it does, sure, miners will feel it too, but ofc the whole economy takes the biggest hit. PoW won't die from a little oil spike, too many people are invested. Also +1 on renewables, more miners switching to solar/wind makes it less risky. Maybe small miners will have problems, but big farms just adapts. The thing is, if energy prices goes up, the network becomes more efficient over time, hashpower always finds a way. Really, its more than about the economy than mining, miners will survive anyway.🖥️
  
• 

  P3nq1u

  3.1 out of 5 stars Verified Purchase

  Tour story looks like a fairy tale. I had similar issues with a hard drive that on top of everything was encrypted. In the end we màaged to decrypt and all ended well. Happy to try and answer any question you may have. All the best Mathias🦓

  So a long time ago I made Servercoin, a decentralized cloud marketplace with its own review apps. I've tried getting feedback before, but usually no one says anything. Anyone who wants to try it, and see if it's useful, and critique the UI? No one's using it yet, so you'd be the first to try even though it's not really new🪖

  This is Bitcointalk, and there were many cases where scammers and bad actors were exposed because of their accounts. I've seen a reputable account sold to a scammer, and because of his account standing, he scammed other people. When it comes to escrow, so much depends on your community interaction, and based on what I read in the community's response to your threads, you are plus-negative.▶️

  In the current understanding the body consensus, you need a public key to spend any coin in a safe way. As long as there is no alternative for OP_CHECKSIG, we have, what we have. Also, if public keys are exposed, then making multisigs is easier, which is also why Taproot keys are not hashed, but just used directly. I think if we would have only P2PK, and we would know, what we know today, then all new address types could be just attached to P2PK, in a similar way, as it is done in P2TR, where you have just some public key in the output, and everything else happens inside the input. If "complicated" means hashing things at least once, then yes, it was "complicated". By the way: the bare multisig works like that: But, nothing prevents people from using hashed public keys instead: So, as you can see, even making multisigs with hashed keys is possible. But of course, it takes more space, and it brings only additional weaknesses, so it was not implemented in that way. Because developers wanted to update the Script. Another reason was to replace ECDSA signatures with Schnorr signatures. However, dropping DER encoding backfired, because OP_SIZE cannot be used on Schnorr signatures that easily, so if you want to lock things on Proof of Work, then you are stuck with P2WSH, because it doesn't work on Taproot, if you don't have new features like OP_CAT.🐆